Hi!
First of all, the members of Congress must "get-over" this 22 cancer
"SEC" qualification that was their intent. None have successfully
explained why this dictate was approved. The controversy continues;
but at
one point in time "All CANCERS WERE QUALIFIED!" The question is who
gets to or has dictated which cancers|relevant disease are work
related
or which cancers|relavent disease are caused by environmental
pollution?
So far, the "defendant caretakers" have been allowed to make that
determination based on their guesstimate IREP theories.
The U.S. House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the EEOICPA is now
available for review. Chair Hostettler indicates the "promise made to
the
COLD WAR veterans. . ." is broken. Chair Hostettler will not be
returning in January when the 110th Congress takes over which is
controlled
by the democrats.
Since so many violations of the Rule of Law and citizen's due process
rights are vacated by the libelous "defendant caretakers" for this
EEOICP purpose, it appears the 110th Congress will have no choice but
to
seek possible remedies. How would it be possible to reform the
EEOICPA?
The listing of the many abuse of discretion acts is very long by now.
For instance, will the 109th Congress recognize that discrimination is
rampant.
You will note during your review of the video that much discussion
takes place regarding significant amounts of taxpayer funding that has
been
squandered on administrative costs and on the the government
oppressors' ways and means to reduce and/or "save" the funding that was
appropriated to compensate the sick and dying workers or their spouse
survivors.
Also, the presence of the current U.S. Advisory Board on Radiation and
Workers Health is attacked by the witnesses. Certain "defendant
caretakers" are identified as well as their abusive behavior during the
hearing. Once again the suppressed claimants have a window of
opportunity
to identify many more government employee offenders. Simply offer
written testimony regarding the horrors you have suffered and
distribute to
your Congressional representatives. For instance, you can help by
identify and affirming that USHHS-NIOSH director of OCAS Larry Elliott
has
been an abusive and controlling dictator regarding his and his
supervisors' reasons for seeing to it that tens of thousands of
meritorious
claimants are denied their entitlements according to the EEOICPA
provisions. Elliott is my perception of a well-paid oppressor.
Elliott was
removed from the current U.S. President's Advisory Board on Radiation
and
Workers Health and Safety because of his proven conflicts of interest.
Current President George W. Bush reinstated Wanda Munn who was removed
from the Advisory Board because she had no administrative value or any
particular expertise having to do with with the mission of the Advisory
Board. Munn is also a member of the Hanford Advisory Board. She
protested her removal from the ABoRWH and was reassigned by order of
President Bush. What does that finally tell us about Munn's mission.
Since
she began to make her appearance on these boards, she has always been a
very controversial figure. Munn always seems to manage to promulgate
and/or promote the wrong message. She is a retired Hanford engineer.
Gai Oglesbee, Independent National Advocate
EEOICP Claimant | Downwinder
National Nuclear Victims for Justice
www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com" target=_blank
>www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com
--------------
URL internet loaction:
www.house.judiciary.gov" target=_blank
>www.house.judiciary.gov
Click on legislative. . .
then. . .
Click on Energy Employees hearing
then. . .
Select the "video" telecast indicator and wait for it to boot up. The
video is over an hour long.
The November 16, 2006, hearing was postponed until further notice. It
was announced that there is substantial interest by key members of
Congress.
First of all, the members of Congress must "get-over" this 22 cancer
"SEC" qualification that was their intent. None have successfully
explained why this dictate was approved. The controversy continues;
but at
one point in time "All CANCERS WERE QUALIFIED!" The question is who
gets to or has dictated which cancers|relevant disease are work
related
or which cancers|relavent disease are caused by environmental
pollution?
So far, the "defendant caretakers" have been allowed to make that
determination based on their guesstimate IREP theories.
The U.S. House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on the EEOICPA is now
available for review. Chair Hostettler indicates the "promise made to
the
COLD WAR veterans. . ." is broken. Chair Hostettler will not be
returning in January when the 110th Congress takes over which is
controlled
by the democrats.
Since so many violations of the Rule of Law and citizen's due process
rights are vacated by the libelous "defendant caretakers" for this
EEOICP purpose, it appears the 110th Congress will have no choice but
to
seek possible remedies. How would it be possible to reform the
EEOICPA?
The listing of the many abuse of discretion acts is very long by now.
For instance, will the 109th Congress recognize that discrimination is
rampant.
You will note during your review of the video that much discussion
takes place regarding significant amounts of taxpayer funding that has
been
squandered on administrative costs and on the the government
oppressors' ways and means to reduce and/or "save" the funding that was
appropriated to compensate the sick and dying workers or their spouse
survivors.
Also, the presence of the current U.S. Advisory Board on Radiation and
Workers Health is attacked by the witnesses. Certain "defendant
caretakers" are identified as well as their abusive behavior during the
hearing. Once again the suppressed claimants have a window of
opportunity
to identify many more government employee offenders. Simply offer
written testimony regarding the horrors you have suffered and
distribute to
your Congressional representatives. For instance, you can help by
identify and affirming that USHHS-NIOSH director of OCAS Larry Elliott
has
been an abusive and controlling dictator regarding his and his
supervisors' reasons for seeing to it that tens of thousands of
meritorious
claimants are denied their entitlements according to the EEOICPA
provisions. Elliott is my perception of a well-paid oppressor.
Elliott was
removed from the current U.S. President's Advisory Board on Radiation
and
Workers Health and Safety because of his proven conflicts of interest.
Current President George W. Bush reinstated Wanda Munn who was removed
from the Advisory Board because she had no administrative value or any
particular expertise having to do with with the mission of the Advisory
Board. Munn is also a member of the Hanford Advisory Board. She
protested her removal from the ABoRWH and was reassigned by order of
President Bush. What does that finally tell us about Munn's mission.
Since
she began to make her appearance on these boards, she has always been a
very controversial figure. Munn always seems to manage to promulgate
and/or promote the wrong message. She is a retired Hanford engineer.
Gai Oglesbee, Independent National Advocate
EEOICP Claimant | Downwinder
National Nuclear Victims for Justice
www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com" target=_blank
>www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com
--------------
URL internet loaction:
www.house.judiciary.gov" target=_blank
>www.house.judiciary.gov
Click on legislative. . .
then. . .
Click on Energy Employees hearing
then. . .
Select the "video" telecast indicator and wait for it to boot up. The
video is over an hour long.
The November 16, 2006, hearing was postponed until further notice. It
was announced that there is substantial interest by key members of
Congress.