Hi!
For your information, review another media disclosure that I posted
below my commentary.
For decades the government contractors "independent status" claim is,
of course ludicrous. The Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) is
the $200 million dollar plus USDOE contractor who was hired by USHHS,
CDC-NIOSH to reconstruct the dose of EEOICP claimants. The Officials
pretend that no EEOICP claimant has or ever will notice that the ORAU's and
cohorts are USDOE contractors with conflicts of interest. The ORAU
agents continue to consult with the current U.S. President's Advisory
Board on Radiation and Workers Health. And, the bogus dose reconstructions
and site profiles are used to deny tens of thousands of mertorius
EEOICP claims.
ORAU admitted conflicts of interest relevant to my claim. But, "the
NIOSH took back the claim," said the ORAU executive who notified me.
And, the NIOSH agents recommended denial of my EEOICP claim because I
refused to sign their "waiver" that states that I agree with their bogus
dose reconstruction assessment.
I note that the manipulative and abusive NIOSH OCAS director Larry
Elliott censored my SEC petition that represents over 7,600 claimants.
Many petitioners have died in the interim.
When I finally decide it is time to file a lawsuit, it is a given that
the USDOL and USHHS employees will continue to claim independent
status, deny conflicts of interest, and deny any wrongdoing. However, at
some point in time legal precedent shall be established during a proper
adjudication process. At this point in time the "defendant caretakers"
don't recognize a claimants pro se status which is, of course, a mandate
that is recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure according to
the Constitution.
And, participating "SEC" petitioners are instructed that they are not
to notice that preferred government IT market consultant-contractor
Sanford, Cohen & Associates (SC&A) are hired to consult with the current
President George Bush's Advisory Board on Radiation and Workers Health.
The wars between the consultants and the Advisory Board members and
their consensus agreements causes the "redaction" of incriminating
evidence and the destruction of public records. The Advisory Board members
claim their "business sensitive" contributions are "privacy act
protected." The Advisory Board members continue to claim their participation on
the board has nothing, whatsoever, to do with the acknowledgement of or
the signing of the conflicts of interest waiver. All remaining
participants declare they have no conflicts of interest. Just recently, two
members were ejected from the Advisory Board because the evidence
affirmed their conflicts of interest so saith the rest of the board me!
mbers.
WE don't have a choice when WE vote in November and thereafter. WE are
simply expected to ignore the findings of fact -- that the candidates
and our elected Congressional representatives shall continue to ignore
the EEOICP scandal.
The EEOICP saga continues as WE prepare to vote for the candidates in
just 26 more days who WE know are aware of the details regarding this
scandal, too.
Gai Oglesbee, Independent National Advocate
EEOICP Claimant | Downwinder
National Nuclear Victims for Justice
www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com
--------------
Knox News: ORNL shares $5M in grants
By News Sentinel staff
October 11, 2006
OAK RIDGE - Oak Ridge National Laboratory was among the
institutions sharing $5 million in nanotechnology research grants
for solid-state lighting.
Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman announced the grants last week
during a trip to the Department of Energy's facilities in New
Mexico.
ORNL will receive $600,000 to conduct a project to improve the
efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes, DOE said in a press
statement.
The federal agency said there is the potential to double the
efficiency of general lighting systems, which would reduce the
energy consumption and save consumers money.
border=0> ? 2006 - Knoxville News Sentinel
For your information, review another media disclosure that I posted
below my commentary.
For decades the government contractors "independent status" claim is,
of course ludicrous. The Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) is
the $200 million dollar plus USDOE contractor who was hired by USHHS,
CDC-NIOSH to reconstruct the dose of EEOICP claimants. The Officials
pretend that no EEOICP claimant has or ever will notice that the ORAU's and
cohorts are USDOE contractors with conflicts of interest. The ORAU
agents continue to consult with the current U.S. President's Advisory
Board on Radiation and Workers Health. And, the bogus dose reconstructions
and site profiles are used to deny tens of thousands of mertorius
EEOICP claims.
ORAU admitted conflicts of interest relevant to my claim. But, "the
NIOSH took back the claim," said the ORAU executive who notified me.
And, the NIOSH agents recommended denial of my EEOICP claim because I
refused to sign their "waiver" that states that I agree with their bogus
dose reconstruction assessment.
I note that the manipulative and abusive NIOSH OCAS director Larry
Elliott censored my SEC petition that represents over 7,600 claimants.
Many petitioners have died in the interim.
When I finally decide it is time to file a lawsuit, it is a given that
the USDOL and USHHS employees will continue to claim independent
status, deny conflicts of interest, and deny any wrongdoing. However, at
some point in time legal precedent shall be established during a proper
adjudication process. At this point in time the "defendant caretakers"
don't recognize a claimants pro se status which is, of course, a mandate
that is recognized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure according to
the Constitution.
And, participating "SEC" petitioners are instructed that they are not
to notice that preferred government IT market consultant-contractor
Sanford, Cohen & Associates (SC&A) are hired to consult with the current
President George Bush's Advisory Board on Radiation and Workers Health.
The wars between the consultants and the Advisory Board members and
their consensus agreements causes the "redaction" of incriminating
evidence and the destruction of public records. The Advisory Board members
claim their "business sensitive" contributions are "privacy act
protected." The Advisory Board members continue to claim their participation on
the board has nothing, whatsoever, to do with the acknowledgement of or
the signing of the conflicts of interest waiver. All remaining
participants declare they have no conflicts of interest. Just recently, two
members were ejected from the Advisory Board because the evidence
affirmed their conflicts of interest so saith the rest of the board me!
mbers.
WE don't have a choice when WE vote in November and thereafter. WE are
simply expected to ignore the findings of fact -- that the candidates
and our elected Congressional representatives shall continue to ignore
the EEOICP scandal.
The EEOICP saga continues as WE prepare to vote for the candidates in
just 26 more days who WE know are aware of the details regarding this
scandal, too.
Gai Oglesbee, Independent National Advocate
EEOICP Claimant | Downwinder
National Nuclear Victims for Justice
www.nnvj-goglesbee-eeoicp-abuse.com
--------------
Knox News: ORNL shares $5M in grants
By News Sentinel staff
October 11, 2006
OAK RIDGE - Oak Ridge National Laboratory was among the
institutions sharing $5 million in nanotechnology research grants
for solid-state lighting.
Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman announced the grants last week
during a trip to the Department of Energy's facilities in New
Mexico.
ORNL will receive $600,000 to conduct a project to improve the
efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes, DOE said in a press
statement.
The federal agency said there is the potential to double the
efficiency of general lighting systems, which would reduce the
energy consumption and save consumers money.
border=0> ? 2006 - Knoxville News Sentinel
posted by:
|
